Re: scary patch contest

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: scary patch contest
Date: 2026-08-28 18:31:25
Message-ID: apHT_bCJL2GXuTAf@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Looping back to Robert's list:

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:48:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> 1. RI fast-path FK checks / batching (2da86c1ef9b, b7b27eb41a5,
> 2. REPACK / REPACK CONCURRENTLY (ac58465e061, 28d534e2ae0, Antonin
> 3. Online data checksums (f19c0eccae9, Daniel Gustafsson and Magnus
> 4. UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION OF (8e72d914c52, Paul Jungwirth c/b Peter
> 5. SQL/PGQ property graphs (2f094e7ac69, Peter Eisentraut and Ashutosh
> 6. postgres_fdw statistics import (28972b6fc3d, Corey Huinker and

I see a lot of work happening on Online data checksums and REPACK. Is
that a good thing, or a concern since we are a month away from release?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-08-28 18:48:51 Re: scary patch contest
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-08-28 18:12:34 Re: pg_stat_get_autovacuum_scores ignores the main table's reloptions for TOAST tables