| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_get_autovacuum_scores ignores the main table's reloptions for TOAST tables |
| Date: | 2026-08-28 18:12:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoC4JF+YdptSLpJSqo8sytMSDiptg0p4i9H2+6PpqA+smg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 8:16 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 10:02:42AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Here is a patch.
>
> Sorry for the noise. I noticed some silly mistakes in v1, so here's a v2
> with those fixed.
Thank you for making the patch quickly! The patch looks good to me. A nitpick:
+ if (found && hentry->ar_hasrelopts)
+ avopts = &hentry->ar_reloptions;
ar_hasrelopts is always true here, since entries are only created when
extract_autovac_opts() returns non-NULL, so the second conjunct is
redundant actually. Having said that, it seems safer for future
changes and keeping it for symmetry with do_autovacuum() seems fine to
me.
Do we want to have regression tests for it? FWIW no test exercises
pg_stat_get_autovacuum_scores(). The only reference in the tree is the
view definition in rules.out. That's presumably why this went
unnoticed.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2026-08-28 18:31:25 | Re: scary patch contest |
| Previous Message | Nick Ivanov | 2026-08-28 18:05:43 | Re: Possible race condition in pg_basebackup |