Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2015-09-06 17:05:27
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.10.1509061903050.28958@sto
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here is a rebased two-part v11.

> * We don't do one-line ifs;

I've found one instance.

> function parameters are always in the same line as the function name

ISTM that I did that, or maybe I did not understand what I've done wrong.


Attachment Content-Type Size
checkpoint-continuous-flush-11a.patch text/x-diff 20.0 KB
checkpoint-continuous-flush-11b.patch text/x-diff 28.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-09-06 17:39:57 Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-09-06 14:05:01 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing