Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2015-08-27 12:32:39
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.10.1508271424500.8280@sto
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Andres,

>> Please find attached a v10, where I have reviewed comments for style &
>> contents, and also slightly extended the documentation about the flush
>> option to hint that it is essentially useful for high write loads.
>> Without further data, I think it is not obvious to give more definite
>> advices.
> v10b misses the checkpoint_sort part of the patch, and thus cannot be
> applied.

Yes, indeed, the second part is expected to be applied on top of v10a.

Please find attached the cumulated version (v10a + v10b).


Attachment Content-Type Size
checkpoint-continuous-flush-10.patch text/x-diff 45.0 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-08-27 12:41:06 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2015-08-27 11:35:12 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual