| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |
| Date: | 2015-08-27 12:32:39 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1508271424500.8280@sto |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Andres,
>> Please find attached a v10, where I have reviewed comments for style &
>> contents, and also slightly extended the documentation about the flush
>> option to hint that it is essentially useful for high write loads.
>> Without further data, I think it is not obvious to give more definite
>> advices.
>
> v10b misses the checkpoint_sort part of the patch, and thus cannot be
> applied.
Yes, indeed, the second part is expected to be applied on top of v10a.
Please find attached the cumulated version (v10a + v10b).
--
Fabien.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| checkpoint-continuous-flush-10.patch | text/x-diff | 45.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-27 12:41:06 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-08-27 11:35:12 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |