Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2015-08-27 12:41:06
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-08-27 14:32:39 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >v10b misses the checkpoint_sort part of the patch, and thus cannot be
> >applied.
> Yes, indeed, the second part is expected to be applied on top of v10a.

Oh, sorry. I'd somehow assumed they were two variants of the same patch
(one with "slim" sorting and the other without).

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-08-27 12:49:31 AcquireRewriteLocks/acquireLocksOnSubLinks vs. rowsecurity
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-08-27 12:32:39 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing