Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-12 22:09:00
Message-ID: agOk_PheI2Rtb0kT@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:33:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Here's a new version of 0001 with a cleaned-up commit message. I've
>> omitted 0002, since it's just the result of running pgindent after apply
>> the first one.
>
> I think we're about ready to roll on doing the pgindent run.
> Do you want to push your patch tomorrow AM, and then I'll get
> on with the rest?

Sounds good. We won't be back-patching any of this, right?

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-05-12 22:12:21 Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Previous Message Afrah Razzak 2026-05-12 21:59:31 [PATCH] psql: Add missing IO option to EXPLAIN tab completion