Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-12 22:12:21
Message-ID: 100079.1778623941@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:33:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we're about ready to roll on doing the pgindent run.
>> Do you want to push your patch tomorrow AM, and then I'll get
>> on with the rest?

> Sounds good. We won't be back-patching any of this, right?

Right, just HEAD.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2026-05-12 22:28:54 Re: Add \pset options for boolean value display
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-05-12 22:09:00 Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs