Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-12 21:33:50
Message-ID: 94060.1778621630@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a new version of 0001 with a cleaned-up commit message. I've
> omitted 0002, since it's just the result of running pgindent after apply
> the first one.

I think we're about ready to roll on doing the pgindent run.
Do you want to push your patch tomorrow AM, and then I'll get
on with the rest?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2026-05-12 21:45:05 Re: Missing jsonb_ ... functions on DOCs
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2026-05-12 21:20:25 Re: [PATCH] libpq: try all addresses for a host before moving to next on target_session_attrs mismatch