Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-06 15:15:07
Message-ID: afta-6zVawsxlt1v@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 11:02:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Some of our changes to pg_bsd_indent bumped INDENT_VERSION. Should we do
>> that here?
>
> We already have an INDENT_VERSION bump queued for the
> space-between-comma-and-period change. I don't think we need two
> bumps in this cycle, as long as we coordinate pushing these changes.

Okay. I'll go ahead and commit the patches for $subject then, leaving out
the version bump.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-05-06 15:17:17 Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2026-05-06 15:05:53 Re: PSA: Planning to grease protocol connections during 19beta