Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-06 15:02:35
Message-ID: 771696.1778079755@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Some of our changes to pg_bsd_indent bumped INDENT_VERSION. Should we do
> that here?

We already have an INDENT_VERSION bump queued for the
space-between-comma-and-period change. I don't think we need two
bumps in this cycle, as long as we coordinate pushing these changes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2026-05-06 15:05:53 Re: PSA: Planning to grease protocol connections during 19beta
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-05-06 14:58:27 Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL