Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-06 15:17:17
Message-ID: 773076.1778080637@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 11:02:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We already have an INDENT_VERSION bump queued for the
>> space-between-comma-and-period change. I don't think we need two
>> bumps in this cycle, as long as we coordinate pushing these changes.

> Okay. I'll go ahead and commit the patches for $subject then, leaving out
> the version bump.

No, *don't* do it right now. You'll break anyone using the
in-tree version, or if you also commit the ensuing code changes,
you'll break anyone using an out-of-tree copy. This stuff all
needs to go in at once.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-05-06 15:20:26 Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-05-06 15:15:07 Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs