Re: off-by-one in pg_repack index loop

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Lakshmi N <lakshmin(dot)jhs(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: off-by-one in pg_repack index loop
Date: 2026-05-04 18:02:01
Message-ID: afjfEPsb8yFyssw8@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2026-Apr-29, John Naylor wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 2:35 PM Lakshmi N <lakshmin(dot)jhs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > if (unlikely(list_length(ind_oids_new) < pos))
> > elog(ERROR, "list of new indexes too short");
> > ident_idx_new = list_nth_oid(ind_oids_new, pos);
> > break;
>
> If we're going to change this, let's also get rid of the "unlikely",
> since it's just a noise word here -- see commit 913ec71d6.

Thanks, pushed that way.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Computing is too important to be left to men." (Karen Spärck Jones)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM 2026-05-04 18:08:06 Re: [Bug]Vacuum full silently NULL out fast default columns
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-05-04 17:41:38 Re: [Bug]Vacuum full silently NULL out fast default columns