Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?

From: Fred Moyer <fred(at)redhotpenguin(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Date: 2009-12-10 18:52:25
Message-ID: ad28918e0912101052s2c7c08acga72d9eb9aa421a7c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: sfpug

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> What hosts, both virtual hosts and colos, do you recommend for
> PostgreSQL-based applications, and which ones have you had bad
> experiences with?   If we get a list together, we'll put it up somewhere
> community.
>
> For my part, I've had reasonably good experiences with:
>
> -- Layer42 for low-end colo, but watch your bandwith, they won't.

At the risk of giving away one of my best kept secrets, Layer42 is
simply the most outstanding and professional colocation provider I
have ever had the pleasure to work with. Their network is FAST and
unbelievably reliable. Steve and his team are of the highest caliber.
After going through half a dozen different providers of virtual hosts
and colocations, I finally found a provider that I can trust with my
mission critical needs.

They are located in Santa Clara which is a bit of a drive, but
considering I only need to ever make the trip to add more capacity, I
don't mind it one bit. I highly recommend them.

In response to

Responses

Browse sfpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Livni 2009-12-10 19:02:12 Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-12-10 18:43:47 Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?