Re: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tatsuro Yamada <yamatattsu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation
Date: 2026-01-11 06:27:18
Message-ID: aWNCxkpXrzHihD98@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 01:01:33PM +0900, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> Yeah, it's minor but there is a quote that says God is in the details.

At some degree, yes, see 540c39cc56f5.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2026-01-11 07:09:58 Re: LLVM 22
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-01-11 04:58:45 Re: Correct comment wording in extension.c