| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: LLVM 22 |
| Date: | 2026-01-11 07:09:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLJ63fpt_u0OXDR91fbpicDXK01fivzDSBMOtPazEanFQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 6:02 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2026 at 3:02 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 1. We won't need our local llvm::backport::SectionMemoryManager for
> > LLVM 22, so it will be nice to draw a line under that messy business.
> > See commit message for details.
>
> While that's true, there is a problem with the patch I posted:
> "ReserveAlloc" is not enabled when called from C. I can't actually
> reproduce the issue locally due to lack of RAM connected to an ARM
> CPU, or I'd have noticed that... I'll attempt to do something about
> that upstream[1], let's see... if not, we can still use the new
> in-tree SectionMemoryManager, but we'll still need some C++ glue code.
That was successful, so here is an update.
A new unrelated assertion started firing in LLVM main/22 a few days ago:
v_nullbytemask = l_int8_const(lc, 1 << ((attnum) & 0x07));
Assertion failed: (llvm::isUIntN(BitWidth, val) && "Value is not
an N-bit unsigned value")
Here is a fix for that.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-jit-Skip-local-SectionMemoryManager-for-LLVM-22.patch | text/x-patch | 5.3 KB |
| v2-0002-jit-Stop-using-lifetime.end-intrinsic-for-LLVM-22.patch | text/x-patch | 3.9 KB |
| v2-0003-jit-Fix-integer-constants-for-LLVM-22.patch | text/x-patch | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-01-11 07:10:36 | Re: [PATCH] Fix minor issues in astreamer_zstd.c |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-01-11 06:27:18 | Re: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation |