Re: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation

From: Tatsuro Yamada <yamatattsu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation
Date: 2026-01-12 01:41:42
Message-ID: CAOKkKFsWe7tmHM6a8jNko4uAZEzybNsn-uFNULXBvJ0jNMD6xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael-san,

On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 3:27 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> At some degree, yes, see 540c39cc56f5.
>

Thank you for committing the patch!

Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-01-12 01:41:45 Re: Refactor replication origin state reset helpers
Previous Message David Rowley 2026-01-12 00:54:00 Re: [PATCH] Add support for SAOP in the optimizer for partial index paths