Re: Thoughts on a "global" client configuration?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on a "global" client configuration?
Date: 2025-10-13 20:33:56
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa3YRrkn0eh1ugWcU-9exrhD5EzOqZ5+bQT2-Hd-auJcQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 4:30 PM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> Re: Robert Haas
> > So you support calling it libpq.so.5 forever, no matter how much we change?
>
> I would say SONAME/ABI/API breakages are not a tool to promote better
> SSL settings. If we want to move to sslmode=verify-full by default, we
> should just do that. I don't see why adding extra ABI/API pain would
> make that transition any better for users.
>
> We can move to libpq6 if there are technical reasons, but the general
> pain will be long-lasting until the whole world has caught up. (Debian
> etc can switch pretty easily, but there's a gazillion of third-party
> things.)

OK, good to know. I somehow can't get over how crazy it seems to
hadcode the version to 5 forever, but, eh, [ old man yells at cloud
emoji here ].

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2025-10-13 20:43:11 GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-10-13 20:33:01 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart