| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry |
| Date: | 2025-06-12 15:35:12 |
| Message-ID: | aErzsHAQvLGoS2AA@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:15:36PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> I tested v6 and I think GetNamedDSA is a good addition. I did
> not find any issues with the code. However, I am still convinced
> that GetNamedDSMHash should not append " Hash" to the tranche
> name of the dshash [0]. I am ok with " DSA" because the DSA tranche
> is created implicitly by the API.
Okay, I've done this in the attached patch.
--
nathan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7-0001-simplify-creating-hash-table-in-dsm-registry.patch | text/plain | 15.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-06-12 15:52:31 | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2025-06-12 15:28:39 | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |