From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
Date: | 2025-06-12 15:28:39 |
Message-ID: | 202506121528.ikno4362mzpu@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Jun-12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This new code uses the term "TLS" where the rest of PostgreSQL, including
> the rest of psql, uses the term "SSL". Making this different seems
> uselessly confusing. I suggest the attached patch to use "SSL" here as
> well.
Sure, let's do that for now.
I think in the long term (19?) we should replace all uses of SSL with
TLS.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-06-12 15:35:12 | Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-06-12 15:17:55 | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |