Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date: 2025-06-12 15:28:39
Message-ID: 202506121528.ikno4362mzpu@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Jun-12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> This new code uses the term "TLS" where the rest of PostgreSQL, including
> the rest of psql, uses the term "SSL". Making this different seems
> uselessly confusing. I suggest the attached patch to use "SSL" here as
> well.

Sure, let's do that for now.

I think in the long term (19?) we should replace all uses of SSL with
TLS.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-12 15:35:12 Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-06-12 15:17:55 Re: pg_dump --with-* options