Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: 2025-06-05 04:57:30
Message-ID: aEEjuuIyRTYPp_-q@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 10:04:23AM +0900, Shinya Kato wrote:
> Thank you. It looks good to me.

How does the RMT feel about this change? Nathan, would you be OK with
that? It's not a big problem, as well, if the code is kept as-is, but
as it's a simple change..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-06-05 05:07:44 Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Previous Message jian he 2025-06-05 04:22:40 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands