Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Date: 2025-06-05 05:07:44
Message-ID: aEEmIGlrHPZCTkyI@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:58:50AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> commit 01463e1 wrote:
>> +NOTICE: I am regress_groot

Ahah. Excellent.

> Let's not incur trivially-avoidable trademark risks
> (https://google.com/search?q=%22i+am+groot%22) in the source tree.

But you may be right that it could be a problem, and that's just a
matter of applying a s/regress_groot/regress_dt_user/ or something
equivalent, so let's do the change.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Suraj Kharage 2025-06-05 05:52:39 Potential issue in listExtensions()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-06-05 04:57:30 Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness