| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <mujeeb(dot)sk(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, ilyaevdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mujeebskdev <mujeeb(dot)sk(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Subject: | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2025-05-29 23:34:49 |
| Message-ID: | aDjvGZXFMGMJAAHr@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:28:35AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 01:53:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Now, I don't really want to take a leap of faith without the RMT being
>> OK with that now that we are in beta1.
>
> After reading through this thread and the latest patch set, I don't see any
> strong reason for the RMT to object to this change for v18. IIUC some
> extensions may need to adapt, but we're still a few months from 18.0, so
> that seems okay. I vaguely recall that we've made other small
> extension-breaking changes during the beta period for previous major
> releases.
Thanks, Nathan. Let's proceed with the change then. David, would you
prefer handling the patch you have written by yourself for the query
ID part?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-05-29 23:51:02 | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-05-29 23:32:01 | Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them |