| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <mujeeb(dot)sk(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, ilyaevdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mujeebskdev <mujeeb(dot)sk(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Subject: | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2025-05-29 23:51:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvrXRt7+bv342Zmk5Lyki+y5ftCn=+UL=Dw+vHSWpEmGnA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 11:35, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Thanks, Nathan. Let's proceed with the change then. David, would you
> prefer handling the patch you have written by yourself for the query
> ID part?
Yes. I'll look at that again shortly.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2025-05-30 01:17:18 | Re: Proposal: Job Scheduler |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-05-29 23:34:49 | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |