From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-05-22 14:30:40 |
Message-ID: | aC81EGFGCX3FSf_p@nathan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:20:16AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It also sort
> of looks like we might have a consensus anyway: Jeff said "I lean
> towards making it opt-in for pg_dump and opt-out for pg_upgrade" and I
> agree with that and it seems you do, too. So perhaps Jeff should make
> it so?
+1, I think we should go ahead and do this. If Jeff can't get to it, I'm
happy to pick it up in the next week or so.
--
nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-05-22 14:47:06 | Re: Tree-walker callbacks vs -Wdeprecated-non-prototype |
Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2025-05-22 14:28:58 | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |