Re: libpq compression

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2019-03-25 10:38:56
Message-ID: a5eaca1d-a226-f993-a265-8e5d8ba9bf6e@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/25/19 1:04 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
>
> On 25.03.2019 11:06, David Steele wrote:
>> Konstantin,
>>
>>
>> This patch appears to be failing tests so I have marked it Waiting on
>> Author.
>>
>> I have also removed the reviewer since no review had been done. Maybe
>> somebody else will have a look.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Can you please inform me which tests are failed?
> I have done "make check-world" and there were no failed tests.
> Actually if compression is not enabled (and it is disabled by default
> unless explicitly requested by client), there should be no difference
> with vanilla Postgres.
> So it will be strange if some tests are failed without using compression.

Check out the cfbot report at http://commitfest.cputube.org. Both
platforms were failed earlier but Windows is running again now. Doubt
that will make much difference, though.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-25 10:44:26 Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-03-25 10:21:29 Re: Reduce amount of WAL generated by CREATE INDEX for gist, gin and sp-gist