Re: Copyright in partition.h and partition.c

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Copyright in partition.h and partition.c
Date: 2017-09-05 07:08:22
Message-ID: a4f8c0c0-e931-6d03-758f-52f400122e05@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/09/05 15:48, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Here is the copyright in partition.h:
>
>  * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>
> I think it's reasonable that that matches the copyright in partition.c,
> but partition.c has:
>
>  * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>  * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
>
> Is that intentional?

No, it's unintentional. The difference may have resulted from copying
different files to become partition.h and partition.c, respectively.

Maybe, we should change both to say 2016-2017?

I don't know the exact rule for how we determine those years. Is there
some rule in place about that? When I look at execParallel.c, which
supposedly got introduced into the tree recently, I see 1996-2017. OTOH,
the files in contrib/bloom all have 2016-2017.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-09-05 07:24:04 Re: pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-09-05 07:06:28 Re: pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization