Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes
Date: 2017-08-31 15:38:27
Message-ID: a2c99917-6c31-f87d-af5c-588493dc6577@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 08/31/2017 08:32 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 26 July 2017 at 20:16, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> Given this info also earlier noted this post
> https://www.infoq.com/news/2017/04/postgresql-10-features
>
> I propose the feature list as this
>
> * Logical Replication
> * Native Table Partitioning
> * Improved Query Parallelism
> * Quorum Commit for Synchronous Replication
> * SCRAM-SHA-256 strong authentication
>
> Any objection to me updating the docs to say that now, subject to
> further discussion?

I would argue that Traceable commit is just as interesting as Quorum
Commit (and likely applies to a larger audience). I would also argue
that SCRAM-SHA-256 isn't as "big feature" as we would like it to be as
we have supported strong authentication through external mechanisms for
a very long time.

Other than that, I have no comments and yes we should update the page.

JD

>
> It's better to have something in place soon, even if it is updated later.
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-08-31 16:48:09 Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-08-31 15:32:53 Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes