Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes
Date: 2017-08-31 16:48:09
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa-g61GoWm7pPp7vZyKObe8R=Ocj0h4MrbxbXJ_pWqTKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> * Logical Replication
>> * Native Table Partitioning
>> * Improved Query Parallelism
>> * Quorum Commit for Synchronous Replication
>> * SCRAM-SHA-256 strong authentication
>>
>> Any objection to me updating the docs to say that now, subject to
>> further discussion?
>
> I would argue that Traceable commit is just as interesting as Quorum Commit
> (and likely applies to a larger audience). I would also argue that
> SCRAM-SHA-256 isn't as "big feature" as we would like it to be as we have
> supported strong authentication through external mechanisms for a very long
> time.
>
> Other than that, I have no comments and yes we should update the page.

I think SCRAM authentication is a major feature. I would argue for
adding Andres's executor speedups and Amit's hash index work, too, but
I realize we can't list everything. I'm slightly surprised that
quorum commit for synchronous replication ended up ahead of either of
those; surely that's a pretty niche feature compared to making the
executor faster? But I just work here.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christophe Pettus 2017-08-31 16:50:16 Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-08-31 15:38:27 Re: PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes