Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1

On 9/18/25 2:19 PM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 01:38:44PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> That seems completely backwards to me. We should go with the version
>> that was submitted weeks ago and upon which people have had the
>> opportunity to comment unless you can justify each change that you now
>> want to make at the last minute. Why for example should we drop
>> mentioning the ability to return OLD.* and NEW.* in favor of mentioned
>> UUIDv7? I'd argue that the former is more important than the latter,
>> and I don't see how you can argue otherwise except by appealing to the
>> research you've done over the last several weeks. But none of us have
>> access to that or got a vote in it. These things ought to be decided
>> by consensus. If you want your research to feed into the building of
>> that consensus, you need to do it and present it earlier. For example,
>> if you want to present survey results, I think that's a great way to
>> help decide these kinds of things, but then other people should have
>> the right to present their own survey results and so on in that
>> conversation too.
>
> Quick analysis of the differences:
>
> Common:
> * AIO
> * skip scan
> * pg_upgrade
> * UUIDv7
> * virtual generated columns
> * OAuth
>
> Only v1 (my patch):
> * OLD/NEW for RETURNING
> * temporal constraints
> * EXPLAIN enhancements
>
> Only v2 (Jonathan's):
> * conflict logging
>
> While the EXPLAIN enhancements and conflict logging items seem like super
> useful features, I can see how there might be disagreement over whether
> they belong in the major features list. I'm a little more surprised about
> the omission of OLD/NEW and temporal contraints in v2, though.
>
> That being said, I'm tempted to suggest we UNION the two lists, bikeshed
> over the exact wording for a few hours, and then call it day...

Let's hack on this together for a few and bring a proposal to the list.

Jonathan