Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
> > At 2023-05-20 23:21:57 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
> >> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection
> >> parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats
> >> me to it.
>
> > I was trying the change to see if it would be better to name it
> > "gssdelegate" instead (as in delegate on one side, and accept the
> > delegation on the other), but decided that "gssdelegation=enable"
> > reads better than "gssdelegate=enable".
>
> Yeah, agreed.
>
> > Here's the diff.
>
> Thanks for doing that legwork! I found a couple other places where
> "deleg" had escaped notice, and changed the lot. Watching the
> buildfarm now ...

Thanks all for taking this up over a weekend.

Stephen