Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-21 14:57:38
Message-ID: 258297.1684681058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
> At 2023-05-20 23:21:57 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection
>> parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats
>> me to it.

> I was trying the change to see if it would be better to name it
> "gssdelegate" instead (as in delegate on one side, and accept the
> delegation on the other), but decided that "gssdelegation=enable"
> reads better than "gssdelegate=enable".

Yeah, agreed.

> Here's the diff.

Thanks for doing that legwork! I found a couple other places where
"deleg" had escaped notice, and changed the lot. Watching the
buildfarm now ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-05-21 15:22:05 Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-05-21 14:44:49 Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16