Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 05:12:49PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> ...
>
> > My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but
> > rather have these discussions to get agreement that this is the
> > direction the community wants to go.
>
> The purpose of posting the POC patch was certainly not to present a
> fait accompli design/implementation.
>
> We wanted to solicit some community feedback about the desirability of
> the feature, but because LRG is complicated to describe we felt that
> having a basic functional POC might help to better understand the
> proposal. Also, we thought the ability to experiment with the proposed
> API could help people to decide whether LRG is something worth
> pursuing or not.

I don't think the POC is helping, and I am not sure we really want to
support this style of architecture due to its complexity vs other
options.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson