| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2022-06-02 07:12:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PvEcD7Q3mWfC_YiNVP2Ov58rKHYGo7HByMhs8T8nJtLNg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
...
> My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but
> rather have these discussions to get agreement that this is the
> direction the community wants to go.
The purpose of posting the POC patch was certainly not to present a
fait accompli design/implementation.
We wanted to solicit some community feedback about the desirability of
the feature, but because LRG is complicated to describe we felt that
having a basic functional POC might help to better understand the
proposal. Also, we thought the ability to experiment with the proposed
API could help people to decide whether LRG is something worth
pursuing or not.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jakub Wartak | 2022-06-02 07:59:45 | RE: effective_io_concurrency and NVMe devices |
| Previous Message | Will Mortensen | 2022-06-02 06:34:19 | [PATCH] fix doc example of bit-reversed MAC address |