Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Date: 2022-06-03 00:43:28
Message-ID: YplZMFVzDuVPuC/g@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 09:48:25AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-06-01 13:59:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So, this leads to something like the attached. Does that sound fine
>> to you?
>
> That looks reasonable to me. Do you want to apply it or will you?

Thanks for double-checking! I should be able to take care of that
today.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-06-03 01:42:48 Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-06-03 00:38:35 Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers