Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date: 2022-04-01 06:01:38
Message-ID: YkaVQo44WFTAF2/V@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:51:59PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Is diff -q defined somewhere ? I can't find it in postgres sources nor in
> sources for bf client.

322becb has added such a call, at the end of 002_pg_upgrade.pl.
vcregress.pl also has one before this commit.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-04-01 06:03:40 Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-01 05:59:22 Re: BUG #17448: In Windows 10, version 1703 and later, huge_pages doesn't work.