Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX
Date: 2021-02-20 01:37:08
Message-ID: YDBnxI2+XerHGMPj@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:12:54AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Looks fine.

Thanks, applied then to clarify things.

> Also, I noticed that vacuum recurses into partition heirarchies since v10, but
> pg_stat_progress_vacuum also doesn't show anything about the parent table or
> the progress of recursing through the hierarchy.

Yeah, that's an area where it would be possible to improve the
monitoring, for both autovacuums and manual VACUUMs.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2021-02-20 02:16:50 Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-02-20 01:36:55 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq