Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date: 2021-02-20 02:16:50
Message-ID: CA+HiwqERcOmAsWos5BgJRhMawEh-k4p_HkyHHnMT97pXo9YEdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:54 PM Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, at 2:30 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Here is an updated version of the Seamus' patch that takes into
> > account these and other comments received on this thread so far.
> > Maybe warrants adding some tests too but I haven't.
> >
> > Seamus, please register this patch in the next commit-fest:
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/
> >
> > If you haven't already, you will need to create a community account to
> > use that site.
>
> hi Amit,
>
> Thanks so much for doing this. I had created
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/2987/

Ah, sorry, I had not checked. I updated the entry to add you as the author.

> and it looks like it now shows your patch as the one to use. Let me know if I should do anything else.

You could take a look at the latest patch and see if you find any
problems with my or others' suggestions that I implemented in the v2
patch. Also, please add regression tests for the new feature in
src/test/regress/sql/select_parallel.sql.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2021-02-20 02:25:59 UniqueKey on Partitioned table.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-02-20 01:37:08 Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX