Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX
Date: 2021-02-19 06:12:54
Message-ID: 20210219061254.GI14772@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 03:06:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:17:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have no issues with documenting more precisely on which commands
> > partitions_total and partitions_done apply currently, by citing the
> > commands where these are effective. We do that for index_relid for
> > instance.
>
> Please find attached a patch to do that. Justin, what do you think?

Looks fine.

I removed this from opened items.

Also, I noticed that vacuum recurses into partition heirarchies since v10, but
pg_stat_progress_vacuum also doesn't show anything about the parent table or
the progress of recursing through the hierarchy.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-02-19 06:18:08 Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-02-19 06:12:01 Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages