Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction
Date: 2022-11-21 09:38:57
Message-ID: Y3tHMQj+uxY4o5xh@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 03:15:34PM -0800, Ted Yu wrote:
> + * timestamp. These require a specific handling with their typmod is given
> + * by the function caller through their SQL keyword.
>
> typo: typmod is given -> typmod given
>
> Other than the above, code looks good to me.

Thanks for double-checking. I intended a different wording, actually,
so fixed this one. And applied after an extra round of reviews.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2022-11-21 09:39:03 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-11-21 09:30:29 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum