Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-20 21:36:32
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.10.9909201835240.66830-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I have been thinking, the destroy should be drop, in keeping with SQL.
> destroy was a QUEL'ism.

{create,destroy}{user,db} should be drop'd, personally...admins should use
the SQL commands directly...

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-09-20 22:18:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message David Godin 1999-09-20 18:59:55 Installing PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-09-20 21:40:45 Re: [HACKERS] Command Locations (was Re: HISTORY for 6.5....)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-09-20 21:32:50 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]