Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date: 2011-02-12 21:50:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
Oops, thank for remind !

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
>> useful in a practical way.
>> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
>> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
>> out-of-the-box in 9.2.
>> Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
>> extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
>> necessary.
> btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core.
> 			regards, tom lane

Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su,
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-12 21:55:53
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2011-02-12 21:46:30
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Ibrar AhmedDate: 2011-02-16 15:16:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-12 21:45:16
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group