Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Oops, thank for remind !

Oleg
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
>> useful in a practical way.
>
>> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
>> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
>> out-of-the-box in 9.2.
>
>> Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
>> extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
>> necessary.
>
> btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-10/msg00104.php
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83