Re: This is our slashdot coverage?

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Date: 2006-12-07 04:04:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0612071503040.20822@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Luke Lonergan wrote:

> Josh,
>
> On 12/5/06 7:17 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Depends. Read it another way, it implies that the only reason we're not
> > better than DB2 and Oracle in every way is the lack of windowing
> > functions. Wouldn't that be nice?
>
> And we're building the windowing functions as fast as we can ;-)
>

Yep!

The mention of window functions is weird though. DB2 does not support
window functions AFAIK. Oracle is the only all purpose database that does.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Scott 2006-12-07 04:33:18 Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-12-06 23:33:28 Re: Integrating Replication into Core