| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Date: | 2006-12-06 23:33:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20061206233328.GA7363@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:04:46PM -0800, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Oracle's replication does this, and I wish Slony would. Having access
> to the queuing/communications mechanism that the Slony folks have
> built would be very useful.
Abstraction patches are welcome ;-)
Seriously, though, part of what I'm attempting to achieve (and that
it keeps happening here suggests to me that another list was a bad
idea) is to identify these _elements_. Then we can recycle them,
after all.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-12-07 04:04:10 | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |
| Previous Message | Ewald Geschwinde | 2006-12-06 21:10:53 | Re: Coverage of 8.2 Release |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-12-07 00:14:52 | Re: old synchronized scan patch |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-12-06 23:04:13 | Re: SQL/PSM implemenation for PostgreSQL (roadmap) |