Re: CLUSTER ALL patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, PgSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER ALL patch
Date: 2002-11-18 18:13:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211181912140.12428-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Oh, hold, I now see that clusterdb _can_ do all databases, just like
> vacuumdb. Seems we should keep it. Peter?

Interesting. Do we recommend that users routine recluster all their
databases?

Perhaps we need a more general client-side tool to run some command on all
databases, so we could get rid of clusterdb, vacuumdb, reindexdb,
mycommandofthedaydb, etc.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-18 19:26:38 Re: CLUSTER ALL patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-18 17:17:08 Re: CLUSTER ALL syntax