| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, PgSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER ALL patch |
| Date: | 2002-11-18 19:26:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200211181926.gAIJQcE18645@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Oh, hold, I now see that clusterdb _can_ do all databases, just like
> > vacuumdb. Seems we should keep it. Peter?
>
> Interesting. Do we recommend that users routine recluster all their
> databases?
>
> Perhaps we need a more general client-side tool to run some command on all
> databases, so we could get rid of clusterdb, vacuumdb, reindexdb,
> mycommandofthedaydb, etc.
Yes, I think that makes sense. I think we need to keep clusterdb
_until_ we get a more general solution.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-19 17:20:49 | Re: standardize on "canceled" |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-11-18 18:13:35 | Re: CLUSTER ALL patch |