Re: CLUSTER ALL patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PgSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER ALL patch
Date: 2002-11-17 14:47:00
Message-ID: 200211171447.gAHEl0407405@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:17:20PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Is the clusterdb script now going to be removed?
>
> I think it should be replaced by a version that uses the backend CLUSTER
> ALL functionality, but if people think there's no need it can just be
> removed.

I don't see any need to keep it. We have vacuumdb only so we can vacuum
all databases.

Oh, hold, I now see that clusterdb _can_ do all databases, just like
vacuumdb. Seems we should keep it. Peter?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-11-17 15:10:48 Re: Transaction safe Truncate
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-17 14:45:30 Re: CLUSTER ALL patch