| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | MaRCeLO PeReiRA <gandalf_mp(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.3.4 freezing |
| Date: | 2004-01-28 20:01:28 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0401281300260.26173-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?iso-8859-1?q?MaRCeLO=20PeReiRA?= <gandalf_mp(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> > It isn't the case! I can do everything without
> > problem, and without losing performance. The main
> > problem is the postmaster daemon, that die. (really
> > ;-)
>
> That's pretty hard to believe (we've not had a postmaster-crashing bug
> in a long time), and it's even harder to believe that the symptoms would
> be as you describe if it did. if the postmaster wasn't there, psql
> connection attempts would fail immediately with "connection refused" or
> similar messages.
I'm pretty sure, from his first message, what he means is that the
postmaster process is going into some kind of loop (100% CPU) and not
responding, not necessarily dying. I'm reasonably certain English is not
Marcelo's first language, so it's understandable he'd miss the mark on the
meaning of a few words here and there.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MaRCeLO PeReiRA | 2004-01-28 20:04:37 | Re: 7.3.4 freezing |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-28 19:47:38 | Re: 7.3.4 freezing |