| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and output from \? |
| Date: | 2002-03-11 23:34:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0203111831060.690-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Barwick writes:
> So with no further ado I humbly submit the attached patch, which builds on
> your patch and tidies up / harmonises the \? output.
That looks a lot better. A few things, though:
The change to \a seems to be wrong-headed.
The line for \du speaks of "configured" users. There are no
"unconfigured" users.
\set should be \set [NAME [VALUE]], or strictly speaking even \set [NAME
[VALUE [...]]].
Some lines seem to be in excess of 80 characters.
I guess some of these weren't introduces by you, but if someone is going
to fix this, he might as well take care of these.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2002-03-11 23:55:27 | Re: psql and output from \? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-11 23:00:30 | Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS |