From: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: psql and output from \? |
Date: | 2002-03-11 23:55:27 |
Message-ID: | 200203112355.AAA01152@post.webmailer.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 00:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ian Barwick writes:
> > So with no further ado I humbly submit the attached patch, which builds
> > on your patch and tidies up / harmonises the \? output.
>
> That looks a lot better. A few things, though:
>
> The change to \a seems to be wrong-headed.
What do you mean by "wrong-headed"?
That it should read "toggle aligned output mode" ?
(Would be more logical).
> The line for \du speaks of "configured" users. There are no
> "unconfigured" users.
That line was from the patch by Rod Taylor (March 1, 2002). Didn't think
to change it. Does "list users" do the job? BTW psql-ref.sgml also
says "Lists all configured users (...)"
> \set should be \set [NAME [VALUE]], or strictly speaking even \set [NAME
> [VALUE [...]]].
True. I actually started out with:
\set [NAME [STRING]] set internal variable (no name: list all; no string: '')
which is (almost) accurate but verbose.
> Some lines seem to be in excess of 80 characters.
Longest line is 74 columns (or 77 with the \set line above).
> I guess some of these weren't introduces by you, but if someone is going
> to fix this, he might as well take care of these.
Will submit another patch in the morning (it's late here).
Ian Barwick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-12 00:14:46 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-11 23:34:36 | Re: psql and output from \? |